0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹¾îÆÇ °£È£»ç Á÷¹« ½ºÆ®·¹½º ÃøÁ¤µµ±¸ÀÇ Å¸´çµµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ ºÐ¼®

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Expanded Nursing Stress Scale

°£È£ÇàÁ¤ÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 21±Ç 5È£ p.542 ~ 551
KMID : 0614820150210050542
±è°æ¹Ì ( Kim Kyoung-Mi ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ

³²°æ¾Æ ( Nam Kyung-A ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
ÀÌÀºÈñ ( Lee Eun-Hee ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
Á¤±ÝÈñ ( Jeong Geum-Hee ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to evaluate validity and reliability of the Korean version of the expanded nursing stress scale (ENSS).

Methods: Forward-backward translation of ENSS from English to Korean was conducted. The translated instrument was pilot-tested and administrated to 285 nurses who worked in five general hospitals in Korea. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's ¥á and composite reliability. Validity was evaluated through construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity.

Results: The Korean version of ENSS showed a reliable internal consistency with Cronbach's ¥á.95 and composite reliability .99. Model fit indexes for 46 items were validated by confirmatory factor analysis(goodness of fit index .82, Tucker-Lewis index .92, root mean square error of approximation .04), indicating suitable construct validity. Factor loading of the 48 items (.47~.88) and average variance extracted out of nine factors (.52~.71.) indicated satisfactory convergent validity. Some values of square of the correlation coefficient between factors (.12~.89) were higher than average variance extracted values of each factor (.52~.71) so that it partly satisfied discriminant validity.

Conclusion: Findings show that the Korean version ENSS has good reliability and suitable validity; therefore, can be used to assess and identify Korean nurses' job stress.
KeyWords
°£È£»ç, ½ºÆ®·¹½º, ¿äÀκм®, ¹ø¿ª
Nurses, Psychological stress, Statistical factor analysis, Translations
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed